歡迎光臨
我們一直在努力

HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通9929优化$5/月VPS速度及综合性能测评(HostKvm洛杉矶三网联通9929 VPS怎么样)

本文于 2021-03-13 21:58 更新,本文內容具有時效性,如有失效,請在博客站內搜相關商家名稱,即可查看到關於此商家的最新優惠活動! 國外商家建議使用“谷歌瀏覽器”訪問,因為谷歌瀏覽器支持右鍵選擇“翻譯成中文”! !

此商家服务器严禁任何违规、违法用途,包括但不仅限于黄、赌、“dai理”、欺诈、攻击等,一经发现商家会删号处理! !

美国西部沿海到大陆目前性价比最高的线路要数三网回程联通CUVIP线路,因为此线路目前相对CN2 GIA来说价格更为便宜,因此洛杉矶三网回程联通9929线路具有大带宽、低延迟、低价格的特点!所以近期很多商家主推此线路产品。前面博主在HostKvm新上洛杉矶联通优化VPS(1核1G内存折后$5/月)文章当中介绍了2013年成立于的老商家HostKvm新上线的洛杉矶三网回程联通优化线路VPS,1核1G内存配置折后是$5.2/月,分配100Mbps带宽端口,500GB月流量!HostKvm运营时间比较长,旗下虚拟服务器承诺硬件资源不超售,属于相对靠谱商家,因此1核1G内存配置轻量建站是可以满足的!

HostKvm洛杉矶三网联通VPS怎么样,洛杉矶三网回程联通9929线路怎么样?博主开通了HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化线路的套餐,此文章当中记录了HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS速度及综合性能测评结果,有需求的可以查看下面详细内容。

一、HostKvm洛杉矶三网联通VPS套餐整理

HostKvm洛杉矶三网联通优化线路VPS目前仅有下面一个套餐,如果有洛杉矶CN2 GIA线路VPS需求,可以查看此文章:HostKvm新上洛杉矶联通优化VPS(1核1G内存折后$5/月),里面有HostKvm洛杉矶VPS的全部套餐介绍。

  • 美国洛杉矶B区测试IP:usku.speedtest.hostkvm.com(联通优化线路)
  • CPU:1核
  • 内存:1G
  • 硬盘:15GB SSD
  • 带宽:100Mbps
  • 流量:500G/月
  • IPv4:1个
  • 优惠码:2021
  • 价格:$5.2/月(8折后)
  • 链接:点击直达

 

二、HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS网络速度及综合性能测评

1、HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS网络速度测评

HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS全球节点ping测试结果。电信平均延迟160.6毫秒、移动平均延迟167.3毫秒、联通平均延迟151.9毫秒!

HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS全球节点丢包及网络抖动情况测试。从测试结果来看只有三个节点有丢包情况,网络抖动情况时比较小的,几乎是没有异常波动。

HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS三网去程路由追踪测试。电信163直连、移动CMI直连、联通9929直连。

HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS电信联通移动三网回程路由追踪测试。电信、联通、移动三网回程都走联通AS9929!

Traceroute to China, Beijing CU (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop)
============================================================
traceroute to 123.125.99.1 (123.125.99.1), 30 hops max, 32 byte packets
 1  192.168.255.244  11.76 ms  *  LAN Address
 2  192.168.222.252  11.67 ms  *  LAN Address
 3  192.168.222.254  0.79 ms  *  LAN Address
 4  162.219.85.241  1.27 ms  AS10099  China, Hong Kong, ChinaUnicom
 5  203.160.75.218  129.09 ms  AS10099  China, Hong Kong, ChinaUnicom
 6  218.105.2.93  129.54 ms  AS9929  China, ChinaUnicom
 7  218.105.131.101  149.76 ms  AS9929  China, ChinaUnicom
 8  210.78.28.70  150.58 ms  *  China, ChinaUnicom
 9  219.158.35.45  151.12 ms  AS4837  China, ChinaUnicom
10  219.158.5.129  152.75 ms  AS4837  China, ChinaUnicom
11  *
12  125.33.187.126  153.71 ms  AS4808  China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom
13  124.65.194.42  150.82 ms  AS4808  China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom
14  61.135.113.154  152.00 ms  AS4808  China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom
15  *
16  *
17  123.125.99.1  152.14 ms  AS4808  China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom

Traceroute to China, Beijing CT (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop)
============================================================
traceroute to 180.149.128.1 (180.149.128.1), 30 hops max, 32 byte packets
 1  192.168.255.244  12.48 ms  *  LAN Address
 2  192.168.222.252  11.82 ms  *  LAN Address
 3  192.168.222.254  0.55 ms  *  LAN Address
 4  162.219.85.241  1.10 ms  AS10099  China, Hong Kong, ChinaUnicom
 5  203.160.75.218  130.39 ms  AS10099  China, Hong Kong, ChinaUnicom
 6  218.105.2.201  129.85 ms  AS9929  China, ChinaUnicom
 7  218.105.131.125  151.11 ms  AS9929  China, ChinaUnicom
 8  210.78.28.82  151.58 ms  *  China, ChinaUnicom
 9  202.97.16.61  151.44 ms  AS4134  China, ChinaTelecom
10  *
11  36.110.246.146  154.81 ms  AS23724  China, Beijing, ChinaTelecom
12  180.149.128.1  156.22 ms  AS23724  China, Beijing, ChinaTelecom

Traceroute to China, Beijing CM (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop)
============================================================
traceroute to 211.136.25.153 (211.136.25.153), 30 hops max, 32 byte packets
 1  192.168.255.244  15.37 ms  *  LAN Address
 2  192.168.222.252  10.21 ms  *  LAN Address
 3  192.168.222.254  0.53 ms  *  LAN Address
 4  162.219.85.241  1.15 ms  AS10099  China, Hong Kong, ChinaUnicom
 5  203.160.75.218  130.59 ms  AS10099  China, Hong Kong, ChinaUnicom
 6  218.105.2.93  133.44 ms  AS9929  China, ChinaUnicom
 7  218.105.131.101  149.46 ms  AS9929  China, ChinaUnicom
 8  210.78.28.74  150.55 ms  *  China, ChinaUnicom
 9  219.158.35.17  151.57 ms  AS4837  China, ChinaUnicom
10  *
11  221.183.25.53  164.87 ms  AS9808  China, ChinaMobile
12  *
13  *
14  *
15  211.136.63.66  173.80 ms  AS56048  China, Beijing, ChinaMobile
16  211.136.67.166  172.21 ms  AS56048  China, Beijing, ChinaMobile
17  211.136.95.226  186.86 ms  AS56048  China, Beijing, ChinaMobile
18  *
19  211.136.25.153  168.43 ms  AS56048  China, Beijing, ChinaMobile

HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS电信联通移动三网上行、下行速度测试。商家标注给的是100Mbps带宽端口,但是下面测试结果显示能跑到500Mbps上行、100Mbps下行。带宽端口超乎预期。

HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS海外节点上行、下行带宽速度测试。美国地区差不多上下行能跑满70-90Mbps的样子。欧洲地区50-70Mbps!亚太地区70Mbps!

 ## North America Speedtest

 Softlayer, Washington, USA :   8.94 MiB/s |   71.53 Mbps  | ping  62.960ms
 SoftLayer, San Jose, USA   :  11.16 MiB/s |   89.26 Mbps  | ping  11.164ms
 SoftLayer, Dallas, USA     :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping error!
 Vultr, New Jersey, USA     :   8.91 MiB/s |   71.27 Mbps  | ping  68.521ms
 Vultr, Chicago, USA        :   9.34 MiB/s |   74.73 Mbps  | ping  56.377ms
 Vultr, Atlanta, USA        :   9.49 MiB/s |   75.89 Mbps  | ping  50.742ms
 Vultr, Miami, USA          :   9.07 MiB/s |   72.58 Mbps  | ping  64.897ms
 Vultr, Dallas, USA         :  10.01 MiB/s |   80.05 Mbps  | ping  36.601ms
 Vultr, Seattle, USA        :  10.20 MiB/s |   81.64 Mbps  | ping  30.994ms
 Vultr, Los Angeles, USA    :  10.92 MiB/s |   87.33 Mbps  | ping   1.678ms
 Vultr, Silicon Valley, USA :  10.66 MiB/s |   85.30 Mbps  | ping  13.322ms
 Vultr, New York, USA       :   8.88 MiB/s |   71.07 Mbps  | ping  68.532ms
 Linode, fremont, USA       :  11.12 MiB/s |   88.99 Mbps  | ping  14.159ms
 Linode, atlanta, USA       :   8.03 MiB/s |   64.27 Mbps  | ping  50.454ms
 Linode, dallas, USA        :  10.01 MiB/s |   80.09 Mbps  | ping  42.194ms
 Linode, newark, USA        :  10.06 MiB/s |   80.48 Mbps  | ping  67.967ms
 Linode, toronto, Canada    :   4.13 MiB/s |   33.08 Mbps  | ping  70.440ms
 Ramnode, New York, USA     :   9.87 MiB/s |   78.93 Mbps  | ping  65.920ms
 Ramnode, Atlanta, USA      :   9.96 MiB/s |   79.70 Mbps  | ping  48.687ms
 OVH, Beauharnois, Canada   :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping  78.575ms
 Vultr, Toronto, Canada     :   8.97 MiB/s |   71.72 Mbps  | ping  68.372ms


 ## Europe Speedtest

 Vultr, London, UK            :   6.15 MiB/s |   49.23 Mbps  | ping 133.364ms
 Vultr, Frankfurt, DE         :   5.36 MiB/s |   42.85 Mbps  | ping 152.075ms
 Vultr, Paris, France         :   5.56 MiB/s |   44.45 Mbps  | ping 142.150ms
 Vultr, Amsterdam, NL         :   5.34 MiB/s |   42.69 Mbps  | ping 147.222ms
 Vultr, London, UK            :   6.25 MiB/s |   50.00 Mbps  | ping 133.227ms
 Linode, london, UK           :   7.53 MiB/s |   60.20 Mbps  | ping 135.081ms
 Linode, frankfurt, DE        :   6.33 MiB/s |   50.61 Mbps  | ping 152.192ms
 Linode, frankfurt, DE        :   6.42 MiB/s |   51.34 Mbps  | ping 151.864ms
 LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany :   6.69 MiB/s |   53.56 Mbps  | ping 150.745ms
 Hetzner, Germany             :   3.77 MiB/s |   30.19 Mbps  | ping 163.044ms
 Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL    :   2.42 MiB/s |   19.35 Mbps  | ping 145.782ms
 EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden      :     311 B/s |      N/A       | ping 167.694ms
 OVH, Roubaix, France         :   5.22 MiB/s |   41.76 Mbps  | ping 156.406ms
 Online, France               :   6.51 MiB/s |   52.04 Mbps  | ping 142.440ms
 Prometeus, Milan, Italy      :     595 B/s |      N/A       | ping 170.865ms


 ## Exotic Speedtest

 Vultr, Sydney, Australia    :   4.71 MiB/s |   37.69 Mbps  | ping 210.015ms
 Linode, Sydney, Australia   :   3.57 MiB/s |   28.56 Mbps  | ping 137.752ms
 Sydney, Australia           :   4.72 MiB/s |   37.76 Mbps  | ping 210.593ms
 Lagoon, New Caledonia       :     517 B/s |      N/A       | ping 172.924ms
 Hosteasy, Moldova           :   3.07 MiB/s |   24.58 Mbps  | ping 187.287ms
 Prima, Argentina            :   1.75 MiB/s |   13.96 Mbps  | ping error!


 ## Asia Speedtest

 SoftLayer, Singapore       :   2.77 MiB/s |   22.15 Mbps  | ping 165.438ms
 Linode, Tokyo, Japan       :   7.82 MiB/s |   62.55 Mbps  | ping 113.599ms
 Linode, Singapore          :   4.21 MiB/s |   33.71 Mbps  | ping 194.876ms
 Linode, mumbai1, India     :   0.98 MiB/s |    7.85 Mbps  | ping 245.729ms
 Vultr, Tokyo, Japan        :   7.04 MiB/s |   56.29 Mbps  | ping 115.539ms
 Vultr, Seoul               :   4.72 MiB/s |   37.76 Mbps  | ping 165.998ms
 Vultr, Singapore           :   4.46 MiB/s |   35.68 Mbps  | ping 173.671ms

2、HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS综合性能测试。

HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS基本信息及硬盘读写速度测试结果。E5-2678 v3处理器、KVM架构,硬盘读写速度比较给力。

HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS解锁流媒体测试结果。博主开通的是意大利原生IP,支持解锁意大利区Netflix!但是商家并没有做任何保证。

HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS的CPU、内存及硬盘性能测试。

HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通优化VPS采用UnixBench跑分测试结果如下:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: 六 3月 13 2021 12:56:07 - 13:24:11
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       37205759.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     4536.1 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               3621.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        550171.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          141748.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1913101.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              793501.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 171707.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               7436.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   6118.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1284.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         524377.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   37205759.3   3188.2
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4536.1    824.7
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3621.3    842.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     550171.1   1389.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     141748.7    856.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1913101.1   3298.5
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     793501.4    637.9
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     171707.5    429.3
Process Creation                                126.0       7436.2    590.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       6118.6   1443.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1284.3   2140.5
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     524377.9    349.6
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1035.3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: 六 3月 13 2021 13:24:11 - 13:52:22
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       71215893.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     9023.0 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               6788.9 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        869643.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          229473.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2780975.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1492056.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 329792.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              11979.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   9682.2 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1337.5 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         937627.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   71215893.1   6102.5
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       9023.0   1640.5
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       6788.9   1578.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     869643.9   2196.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     229473.7   1386.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2780975.9   4794.8
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1492056.0   1199.4
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     329792.0    824.5
Process Creation                                126.0      11979.4    950.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       9682.2   2283.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1337.5   2229.2
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     937627.8    625.1
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1724.2



======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 
聲明:
1、本博客不從事任何主機及服務器租賃業務,不參與任何交易,也絕非中介。博客內容僅記錄博主個人感興趣的服務器測評結果及一些服務器相關的優惠活動,信息均摘自網絡或來自服務商主動提供;所以對本博客提及的內容不作直接、間接、法定、約定的保證,博客內容也不具備任何參考價值及引導作用,訪問者需自行甄別。

2、訪問本博客請務必遵守有關互聯網的相關法律、規定與規則;不能利用本博客所提及的內容從事任何違法、違規操作;否則造成的一切後果由訪問者自行承擔。

3、未成年人及不能獨立承擔法律責任的個人及群體請勿訪問本博客。

4、一旦您訪問本博客,即表示您已經知曉並接受了以上聲明通告。

文章名稱:《HostKvm洛杉矶三网回程联通9929优化$5/月VPS速度及综合性能测评(HostKvm洛杉矶三网联通9929 VPS怎么样)》
文章鏈接:https://www.zhuji999.com/8941.html