歡迎光臨
我們一直在努力

edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera三网联通VPS速度及综合性能测评(洛杉矶Cera机房三网强制联通线路怎么样)

本文于 2021-03-12 14:31 更新,本文內容具有時效性,如有失效,請在博客站內搜相關商家名稱,即可查看到關於此商家的最新優惠活動! 國外商家建議使用“谷歌瀏覽器”訪問,因為谷歌瀏覽器支持右鍵選擇“翻譯成中文”! !

此商家服务器严禁任何违规、违法用途,包括但不仅限于黄、赌、“dai理”、欺诈、攻击等,一经发现商家会删号处理! !

洛杉矶Cera机房三网回程强制联通CUVIP(AS4837)线路是目前比较热门的直连大陆线路,特点是低价、大带宽、直连直连好,因此近期很多商家都上线了该线路的虚拟服务器产品。2021年3月11日创办于2019年的edgeNAT推出了该线路的最新虚拟服务器产品,全部采用KVM架构,虽然是HDD硬盘,但是有SSD缓存优化,所以读写性能并不差。edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网回程联通线路虚拟服务器特点是大带宽,最低1Gbps带宽端口起步,最高套餐可以3Gbps带宽端口、AMD Ryzen 9 3950X高性能处理器。edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网回程联通线路虚拟服务器速度及性能怎么样?博主开通了一款4核4G内存的配置,目前6折优惠是144元/月,是一个2Gbps大带宽端口套餐,下面我们一起来看看edgeNAT洛杉矶三网回程联通线路虚拟服务器测评结果,了解一下洛杉矶Cera机房三网强制联通线路怎么样!

1、edgeNAT洛杉矶三网联通云服务器最新优惠及套餐配置介绍

CPU 内存 SSD IPv4/峰值带宽/流量 价格 链接
1核 0.5G 20G 1个IP/1Gbps/1000G 240元/年 点击直达
1核 1G 20G 1个IP/1Gbps/1500G 30元/月 点击直达
2核 2G 50G 1个IP/2Gbps/3000G 72元/月 点击直达
4核 4G 100G 1个IP/2Gbps/5000G 144元/月 点击直达
6核 8G 200G 1个IP/3Gbps/10000G 240元/月 点击直达

 

2、edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera三网联通VPS速度及综合性能测评

edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网联通线路三网ping测试结果。电信、联通、移动平均延迟163.9毫秒,测试时间是晚上19:30,晚高峰速度比较给力。

edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网联通线路全球节点网络抖动及丢包测试。全球所有测试节点仅有一个丢包,网络稳定性也比较不错,绿色的直线几乎所有节点都是直的。

edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网联通线路去程路由追踪测试情况。电信、联通去程169骨干直连,移动去程CMI直连。

edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网联通线路三网回程路由追踪测试。电信、联通、移动三网回程都强制走AS4837,均为联通线路回程直连没有错。

Traceroute to China, Beijing CU (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop)
============================================================
traceroute to 123.125.99.1 (123.125.99.1), 30 hops max, 32 byte packets
 1  198.16.50.145  0.73 ms  AS40065  United States, California, Los Angeles, ceranetworks.com
 2  *
 3  *
 4  192.168.101.62  0.47 ms  *  LAN Address
 5  *
 6  23.225.225.65  164.47 ms  AS40065  United States, California, Los Angeles, ceranetworks.com
 7  219.158.116.233  174.49 ms  AS4837  China, Shanghai, ChinaUnicom
 8  219.158.113.118  164.72 ms  AS4837  China, Shanghai, ChinaUnicom
 9  219.158.113.105  165.54 ms  AS4837  China, Shanghai, ChinaUnicom
10  219.158.6.161  206.00 ms  AS4837  China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom
11  124.65.194.174  203.72 ms  AS4808  China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom
12  125.33.187.218  210.39 ms  AS4808  China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom
13  124.65.194.134  203.20 ms  AS4808  China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom
14  61.135.113.158  203.85 ms  AS4808  China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom
15  *
16  *
17  123.125.99.1  200.46 ms  AS4808  China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom

Traceroute to China, Beijing CT (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop)
============================================================
traceroute to 180.149.128.1 (180.149.128.1), 30 hops max, 32 byte packets
 1  198.16.50.145  0.45 ms  AS40065  United States, California, Los Angeles, ceranetworks.com
 2  23.224.21.60  0.40 ms  AS40065  United States, California, Los Angeles, ceranetworks.com
 3  192.168.101.201  1.09 ms  *  LAN Address
 4  192.168.101.62  0.53 ms  *  LAN Address
 5  *
 6  23.225.225.65  168.46 ms  AS40065  United States, California, Los Angeles, ceranetworks.com
 7  219.158.97.177  166.96 ms  AS4837  China, Shanghai, ChinaUnicom
 8  219.158.19.86  167.49 ms  AS4837  China, Shanghai, ChinaUnicom
 9  219.158.19.69  162.96 ms  AS4837  China, Shanghai, ChinaUnicom
10  219.158.7.229  192.24 ms  AS4837  China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom
11  219.158.3.6  194.63 ms  AS4837  China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom
12  *
13  *
14  *
15  180.149.128.1  173.40 ms  AS23724  China, Beijing, ChinaTelecom

Traceroute to China, Beijing CM (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop)
============================================================
traceroute to 211.136.25.153 (211.136.25.153), 30 hops max, 32 byte packets
 1  198.16.50.145  0.51 ms  AS40065  United States, California, Los Angeles, ceranetworks.com
 2  *
 3  192.168.101.201  0.85 ms  *  LAN Address
 4  192.168.101.62  0.84 ms  *  LAN Address
 5  *
 6  23.225.225.65  166.32 ms  AS40065  United States, California, Los Angeles, ceranetworks.com
 7  219.158.116.245  135.19 ms  AS4837  China, Shanghai, ChinaUnicom
 8  219.158.113.142  151.83 ms  AS4837  China, Shanghai, ChinaUnicom
 9  219.158.113.105  135.00 ms  AS4837  China, Shanghai, ChinaUnicom
10  219.158.6.169  177.39 ms  AS4837  China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom
11  219.158.5.130  175.63 ms  AS4837  China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom
12  *
13  221.176.15.177  172.18 ms  AS9808  China, Beijing, ChinaMobile
14  *
15  *
16  *
17  211.136.63.66  175.37 ms  AS56048  China, Beijing, ChinaMobile
18  211.136.95.226  171.97 ms  AS56048  China, Beijing, ChinaMobile
19  211.136.95.226  172.01 ms  AS56048  China, Beijing, ChinaMobile
20  *
21  *
22  211.136.25.153  176.52 ms  AS56048  China, Beijing, ChinaMobile

edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网联通线路上行、下行带宽速度测试。电信、联通、移动三网基本都跑到了400Mbps以上的上行、下行最高跑到了1.5Gbps,均为晚上19:30测试的结果哦,表现较为不错。

换个测速脚本看看,有效的测试节点基本都是跑满500Mbps-600Mbps!

 -> Speedtest.net Network Speed Test

 Node Name                      Upload Speed    Download Speed  Ping Latency    Server Name
 Speedtest Default              31.42 MB/s      121.47 MB/s     289.48 ms       MTN SA (South Africa Johannesburg)
 China, Nanjing CU              63.28 MB/s      139.36 MB/s     145.36 ms       China Unicom (China Nanjing)
 China, Shanghai CU             64.19 MB/s      155.15 MB/s     148.09 ms       China Unicom 5G (China ShangHai)
 China, Hangzhou CT             25.69 MB/s      17.55 MB/s      187.88 ms       China Telecom ZheJiang Branch (China Hangzhou)
 China, Nanjing CT              64.17 MB/s      172.31 MB/s     154.25 ms       China Telecom JiangSu 5G (China Nanjing)
 China, Guangzhou CT            7.93 MB/s       92.06 MB/s      174.17 ms       ChinaTelecom 5G (China Guangzhou)
 China, Wuhan CT                31.48 MB/s      61.16 MB/s      159.41 ms       China Telecom Wuhan Branch (China Wuhan)
 China, Shenyang CM             Fail: Timeout Exceeded after 60 seconds
 China, Hangzhou CM             42.91 MB/s      211.98 MB/s     168.23 ms       China Mobile Group Zhejiang Co.,Ltd (China Hangzhou)
 China, Nanning CM              50.24 MB/s      160.38 MB/s     186.79 ms       GX ChinaMobile (China Nanning)
 China, Lanzhou CM              48.02 MB/s      170.49 MB/s     185.13 ms       Lanzhou,China Mobile,Gansu (China Lanzhou)
 Hong Kong, CSL                 49.56 MB/s      7.97 MB/s       154.68 ms       CSL (Hong Kong Kwai Chung)
 Hong Kong, PCCW                60.56 MB/s      134.54 MB/s     155.80 ms       STC (China Hong Kong)
 Korea, South Korea             49.00 MB/s      64.77 MB/s      141.94 ms       kdatacenter.com (South Korea Seoul)
 Japan, GLBB                    89.72 MB/s      76.64 MB/s      108.04 ms       Allied Telesis Capital Corporation (Japan Fussa-shi)
 Taiwan, FET                    Fail: Timeout Exceeded after 60 seconds
 Taiwan, Chief                  69.04 MB/s      171.51 MB/s     142.41 ms       Chief Telecom (Taiwan Taoyuan)
 Taiwan, TWM                    70.31 MB/s      227.84 MB/s     133.52 ms       Taiwan Mobile (Taiwan Taoyuan)
 Singapore, Singtel             48.89 MB/s      163.15 MB/s     181.58 ms       Singtel (Singapore Singapore)
 Singapore, M1                  49.85 MB/s      106.90 MB/s     162.74 ms       M1 Limited (Republic of Singapore Singapore)
 Singapore, NME                 48.84 MB/s      42.25 MB/s      176.15 ms       NewMedia Express (Republic of Singapore Singapore)
 USA, Century Link              255.78 MB/s     235.45 MB/s     25.22 ms        CenturyLink (United States Seattle, WA)

接下来在看看国际节点的测速结果。总体来说对北美速度是较为不错的,晚高峰基本都能跑带300Mbps以上,其次欧洲、亚太也还可以,基本能在100Mbps以上。

 ## North America Speedtest【北美测速度结果】

 Softlayer, Washington, USA :   4.63 MiB/s |   37.06 Mbps  | ping  55.431ms
 SoftLayer, San Jose, USA   :  20.45 MiB/s |  163.58 Mbps  | ping   9.291ms
 SoftLayer, Dallas, USA     :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping error!
 Vultr, New Jersey, USA     :  29.54 MiB/s |  236.35 Mbps  | ping  66.077ms
 Vultr, Chicago, USA        :  37.99 MiB/s |  303.90 Mbps  | ping  57.374ms
 Vultr, Atlanta, USA        :  44.75 MiB/s |  357.96 Mbps  | ping  49.065ms
 Vultr, Miami, USA          :  29.88 MiB/s |  239.08 Mbps  | ping  61.847ms
 Vultr, Dallas, USA         :  66.18 MiB/s |  529.40 Mbps  | ping  33.650ms
 Vultr, Seattle, USA        :  71.10 MiB/s |  568.76 Mbps  | ping  29.381ms
 Vultr, Los Angeles, USA    : 185.24 MiB/s | 1481.94 Mbps  | ping   0.396ms
 Vultr, Silicon Valley, USA : 169.00 MiB/s | 1352.02 Mbps  | ping   7.482ms
 Vultr, New York, USA       :  30.28 MiB/s |  242.24 Mbps  | ping  66.500ms
 Linode, fremont, USA       :  59.91 MiB/s |  479.31 Mbps  | ping  11.657ms
 Linode, atlanta, USA       :  11.41 MiB/s |   91.25 Mbps  | ping  46.226ms
 Linode, dallas, USA        :   4.80 MiB/s |   38.42 Mbps  | ping  35.909ms
 Linode, newark, USA        :   7.62 MiB/s |   60.93 Mbps  | ping  69.349ms
 Linode, toronto, Canada    :  26.82 MiB/s |  214.53 Mbps  | ping  65.792ms
 Ramnode, New York, USA     :   5.08 MiB/s |   40.62 Mbps  | ping  60.019ms
 Ramnode, Atlanta, USA      :   6.34 MiB/s |   50.75 Mbps  | ping  43.406ms
 OVH, Beauharnois, Canada   :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping  72.136ms
 Vultr, Toronto, Canada     :  34.12 MiB/s |  272.99 Mbps  | ping  63.508ms


 ## Europe Speedtest【欧洲测速度结果】

 Vultr, London, UK            :  13.18 MiB/s |  105.45 Mbps  | ping 136.805ms
 Vultr, Frankfurt, DE         :  10.15 MiB/s |   81.19 Mbps  | ping 149.245ms
 Vultr, Paris, France         :  11.82 MiB/s |   94.57 Mbps  | ping 140.890ms
 Vultr, Amsterdam, NL         :  12.04 MiB/s |   96.35 Mbps  | ping 132.675ms
 Vultr, London, UK            :  11.67 MiB/s |   93.35 Mbps  | ping 136.780ms
 Linode, london, UK           :  14.40 MiB/s |  115.17 Mbps  | ping 139.415ms
 Linode, frankfurt, DE        :  11.95 MiB/s |   95.59 Mbps  | ping 137.672ms
 Linode, frankfurt, DE        :   5.33 MiB/s |   42.60 Mbps  | ping 137.734ms
 LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany :  12.13 MiB/s |   97.06 Mbps  | ping 146.691ms
 Hetzner, Germany             :   9.19 MiB/s |   73.51 Mbps  | ping 146.149ms
 Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL    :   2.69 MiB/s |   21.49 Mbps  | ping 138.807ms
 EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden      :     324 B/s |      N/A       | ping 154.861ms
 OVH, Roubaix, France         :   2.70 MiB/s |   21.63 Mbps  | ping 135.035ms
 Online, France               :  13.51 MiB/s |  108.09 Mbps  | ping 138.535ms
 Prometeus, Milan, Italy      :     598 B/s |      N/A       | ping 151.496ms


 ## Exotic Speedtest【其他地区测速度结果】

 Vultr, Sydney, Australia    :  11.45 MiB/s |   91.57 Mbps  | ping 147.607ms
 Linode, Sydney, Australia   :  10.36 MiB/s |   82.87 Mbps  | ping 165.642ms
 Sydney, Australia           :  11.13 MiB/s |   89.01 Mbps  | ping 147.663ms
 Lagoon, New Caledonia       :     583 B/s |      N/A       | ping 169.141ms
 Hosteasy, Moldova           :   3.89 MiB/s |   31.13 Mbps  | ping 177.713ms
 Prima, Argentina            : 491.53 KiB/s |    3.84 Mbps  | ping error!


 ## Asia Speedtest【亚太测速度结果】

 SoftLayer, Singapore       :   1.73 MiB/s |   13.85 Mbps  | ping 172.671ms
 Linode, Tokyo, Japan       :  16.38 MiB/s |  131.01 Mbps  | ping 115.719ms
 Linode, Singapore          :   8.44 MiB/s |   67.48 Mbps  | ping 173.829ms
 Linode, mumbai1, India     :   5.43 MiB/s |   43.46 Mbps  | ping 231.650ms
 Vultr, Tokyo, Japan        :  17.66 MiB/s |  141.27 Mbps  | ping 116.735ms
 Vultr, Seoul               :  12.57 MiB/s |  100.60 Mbps  | ping 145.003ms
 Vultr, Singapore           :   8.26 MiB/s |   66.10 Mbps  | ping 176.628ms

edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网联通虚拟服务器基本信息测试。AMD Ryzen 9 3950X处理器,KVM架构

edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网联通虚拟服务器IP解锁流媒体情况测试。

edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网联通虚拟服务器基本性能测试。SSD优化的HDD硬盘读写速度表现还算可以。

edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera机房三网联通虚拟服务器UnixBench跑分测试结果。5258.8分是非常给力的结果了。

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: 四 3月 11 2021 19:59:02 - 20:30:01
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       50888909.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2766.6 MWIPS (27.5 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               7779.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1645832.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          422338.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       4483346.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             2638199.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 125940.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              21925.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   7280.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   3629.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        3101734.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   50888909.1   4360.7
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2766.6    503.0
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       7779.0   1809.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1645832.1   4156.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     422338.3   2551.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    4483346.5   7729.9
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2638199.3   2120.7
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     125940.2    314.9
Process Creation                                126.0      21925.9   1740.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       7280.6   1717.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       3629.8   6049.7
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    3101734.6   2067.8
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        2117.4

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: 四 3月 11 2021 20:30:01 - 21:00:50
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables      192503613.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    11068.9 MWIPS (26.5 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                              22228.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1388954.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          365802.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       5058717.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             9999279.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                1157303.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              64459.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  30716.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   4479.7 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        8985245.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0  192503613.8  16495.6
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      11068.9   2012.5
Execl Throughput                                 43.0      22228.9   5169.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1388954.8   3507.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     365802.2   2210.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    5058717.7   8721.9
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    9999279.4   8038.0
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0    1157303.6   2893.3
Process Creation                                126.0      64459.8   5115.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      30716.3   7244.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       4479.7   7466.2
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    8985245.5   5990.2
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        5258.8



======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 
聲明:
1、本博客不從事任何主機及服務器租賃業務,不參與任何交易,也絕非中介。博客內容僅記錄博主個人感興趣的服務器測評結果及一些服務器相關的優惠活動,信息均摘自網絡或來自服務商主動提供;所以對本博客提及的內容不作直接、間接、法定、約定的保證,博客內容也不具備任何參考價值及引導作用,訪問者需自行甄別。

2、訪問本博客請務必遵守有關互聯網的相關法律、規定與規則;不能利用本博客所提及的內容從事任何違法、違規操作;否則造成的一切後果由訪問者自行承擔。

3、未成年人及不能獨立承擔法律責任的個人及群體請勿訪問本博客。

4、一旦您訪問本博客,即表示您已經知曉並接受了以上聲明通告。

文章名稱:《edgeNAT洛杉矶Cera三网联通VPS速度及综合性能测评(洛杉矶Cera机房三网强制联通线路怎么样)》
文章鏈接:https://www.zhuji999.com/8881.html